I think the best thing i can be right now is absurd. Absurd in my feelings, my decisions and my desire to free myself of this shithole pain I find myself in where I just want to hurt the people who hurt me. Being stuck there is a horrible place to be, its lonely, its disgusting and its where some obsessive people I know live ---and I dont wanna --sooooo i need to be asburdly funny, rauncy, snarky, stupid, hilarious and me so i can free myself and move the fuck on. Heres to that and this seciton to give me the fucking freedom I need Andrew Jang Funniest fucker alive

I will keep this short You can go to my personal website andrewjang.com if you need ;ore of the backstory. I built this site to be seen, not by the world but by three specific people, Tim Christine of the NFL PLayers Association, Andrew Beaton of the Wall Street Journal and Jon Humbert who used to be with KOMO 4 News in Seattle. The odd reality is that by doing such and admitting it, I effectively handed them my power. But my writing across each section I felt the need to create on this site doesn't reveal that. They each in their own way from the series parts where I present facts to clear my name to the absurd ones where I act like a child all work together to say something else. That I got hurt, and I'm upset. And the only way for me to get out of this mess is to get through this mess - in my head. What is true. What is not. What can I live with. And what can I not. I won't know until I express it all, say it all and feel it all, one last time--and after, who knows. maybe this site can do something good for someone else. Until then, this is nothing more than me figuring it out loud publicly Andrew Jang

I had nothing else. Except more homelessness. More drugs. More falling further and further down and more chances to attempt suicide. Someone explain to me, why I would stay for any of that. Now I knew if I left, and had a safe place to sleep for a while, to collect my thoughts and figure shit out, I could get back up on my feet. This picture should should be all the proof anyone needs that I made the right fucking call. So fuck you for telling people otherwise. You werent living my life, you werent in my head you werent the one motivated to make his life better. But thank you for showing me what a piece of shit journalism looks like from a brand that used to matter in the format of truth. Your Legacy is nothing more then a name that used to be. And your decline isnt from the loss of profits, but in the non existence of integrity, character, honesty and treating Americans with more respect then the manipulation that you call the news where the only thing you report on is the people and the brands you dont like. And that isnt news, thats called a scheme and is the equivalent to teenagers talking shit abuot the one who just lef tthe bathroom, as they inhale the fumes of their own ass, while they hear nothing but the echos of their deceipt. Yes, fuck you and the toilet you print from as you flush your ratings and trust down the drain. ----- I have no adult response from me on this article i just wrote. its real, its raw its how I feel given my personal experience and i will not stand down or explain myself to feel anything different because the fact is. i used to look up to the Wall Street Journal and valued them as the brand that was above legacy. And maybe I should find a way to forgive them. But that part of me that was willing to believe in them blindly is the same that will never forgive them easily. In many ways I feel betrayed by them, which is odd, because technicaly they owe me nothing ---but the reality for me is that if i give you blind trust, that was dedicated, then the very least you can do for me, is to never lie and manipulate and I guess, either be perfect or own up when you aren't ---- and that level of standard is not only fair it is expected for that kind of exchange. But i see the WSJ for what it really is --- nothing special, and in there is the betrayal, because they made me bielieve they were.

There is nothing dumber than Jon Humbert. And I’m not even gonna go there and call him Jon dumbert because that would be dum- Bert. He is so dum in fact, I made up this limerick so simple, even Jon can understand it - one day - There once this guy from Seattle he worked for a news station called KOMO they hired him to lie like a traitorous spy because hes a dumm dummy dum dum dummy DUM-BERT Disclaimer. The claudereport.com does not know the real intent of why Jon Humbert was hired or subseauently left, fired or parted ways. And this limerick in no way shape or form suggests that KOMO 4 uses deceptive hiring practices for ratings. And is meant for satire, humour and entertainment purposes only. -------------------- Coming back to the adult me, reading this a few times I recognize, the name calling and picking on his name is me lashing out against someone that I seriously am upset over. I don't even think I dislike him as a person, which may sound strange, but its his actions that I have a deep resentment over. You see, Jon didn't just do several hit pieces on me where he lied, distorted the truth or just had no real need to do the piece. He went ouf of his way to disrupt my life. He (along with Gary Buckley Woolever and his attorney Bruce Danielson) constantly called one of my landlords, harrassing him. I was behind on rent, but their calls to him were enough where he said he would forgive me if I just left. He wasn't tired of me, he was tired of them. And then later when I was bouncing between friends couch and friends couch, just trying to stay a float, I tried to take my love for fashion and try to make clothes for people. He found out and instantly started harrassing others and publicly kept outing me. But the part that I just cannot get over it seems, is this. I used to volunteer for a non profit called the Millionaires Club in Seattle. It helped homeless find jobs. As part of that they provided interview clothes. I not only donated, I turned to my network and my ability to rally people and rounded up nice suits, shirts, shoes, you name it for men and women and spent time talking to the people they helped understand the dynamics of an interview and early days on the job. He found out about this and harrassed the Executive Director until he asked if I would just stop volunteering. The Executive Director felt horrible, I could tell, but he was clearly tired of the incesent calls and emails from Jon asking why he would let me help. Not only did Jon lie about me. He ruined my reputation. Got me kicked out of my apartment, so I had no home. He then ruined my chance at supporing myself, so I wasnt a deadbeat. And under all of that stres and failure, the one thing that made me feel better about my situation and myself, helping others, he took that away too ----- that totality of everything he took from me is a lot. And because I have no recourse, and because no one will care, and tbh, because I was powerless to stop him, the emasculation from those experiences has morphed into this need to do the only thing I reallly do have control over, and that is my personal attacks on him --- not in the controlled or focused sense, because there is no outlet, or healing that comes in control --- but in the wild, assertive, intentionality that is absurd yet soothing name calling, belittling and shit talking that allows me to just vent, release and you know what move on. It may not all be at once or today, but I do need to say, I do feel better ---because in my own little world, I have no told the bigger world what I think of Jon Humbert and in doing so as Dum-bert, with each person that laughs or smiles, I win. Maybe not in adults points, but in some dignity and that works for me and that younger version of me that went through some shit on behalf of Jon Humbert, KOMO 4 and Gary Buckley Woolever.

i was raised in an era where you would call each other gay, a girl, a dip-tard, an erkel and a nimrod --and that was to the people you liked. At 16, I farmed and sold AT&T long distance services where I got to hangout with mexicans and redneck adults who showed me a side of humor i have never seen. Then around 17 through my 20s I worked in factories, sorting mail, building school buses and tractor trailers. My foreman at one of the places was butch lesbian, whom she always referred to herself as the HDIC = head dyke in charge. She wore cut offs, drove a fatboy and told me more rancid jokes then anyone. She was super hard on me too, but was the first person to ever tell me that I was something special and that she better not see me next year. Her razzing and all the razzing from every teen and adults was an example of how we showed affection and appreciation for the people you liked, looked up too, and valued. And in all of these relationships, bonds - tempoary, fleeting and influential, we interacted not with politness, politcal correctness, kid gloves or vague how you doings --- no, we threw shit, ate shit, dropped each other in shit, and rolled around in shit for, with and amongst each other. I have been talked shit to by every kind of American, from trailer trash to hood rat, including native. I have been slanged at by every kind of Asian from the eastern kind to adopted kind. I have been laughed with and at by Mexicans, Canadians, South Americans, Africans, the white and black kind, the irish, the british (properly) and every form of european, including every balctic state, except Slovakia. I have been preached to by every kind of christian from the real ones to the fake mega church ones and even followers of islam, muslim, hindu, buhdda have taken turns trying to make me laugh or get one past me. From sadists, tarots, gypseys and even accountants have made their way into my life for a joke or a shared moment of some form of shit talking - razzing - laughing - and connecting -- I bring all of these up because, when i tell you, i am well versed, highly trained, beyond experienced in all of the ways of the world - literally at making fun of someone, i truly fucking am. And for a moment, just a brief moment i am going to turn that part of me to full crazy mode --and will enjoy myself as i talk a little shit to releive me of my shit. And hey, just remember, we all are a product of our upbringing --- so for anyone who gets mad, you will have to blame everyone one of those groups qnd types of people who fed me --

Jury selection begins as Andrew Jang takes on KOMO 4 News, the Wall Street Journal, and the NFL Players Association in a CLASS ACTING LAWSUIT in a court of his own making In an unanmous deciscion the people of the world, all 8 billion, minus Andrew Beaton of the Wall Street Journal and Tum Christine of the NFLPA, filed a class acting lawsuit against these organizations. When asked why this is a class acting lawsuit and not a class action one, a spokeperson responded, because their performances were so bad, we might as well get them acting lessons. Plus if they can play with words why should we not do a play on words. When asked why Jon Humbert from KOMO 4 News joined the lawsuit against his own people, he smply responded, "I didnt quite understand the question, I thought I was in the drive through for Dicks Burgers--" Speaking to Andrews attorney, my cousin, Vinny, the acknowledgment was simple. Sometimes, idiots to stupid things. Sometimes, stupids do idiotic tings. Regardless, in the end, all you need is the trooth-uh and a fine trial lawyer. Lucky we have both over here. More updates to come as jurory deliberations begin. Article by John (e)Q-qulizer - Beat Reporter and Reporter of Beats

Video coming soon on tiktok - please know for the dimwitted - this is just for fun.

Five year old me, the day I was adopted. Flew into Des Moines Iowa 1984 Jang Insoo would soon become Andrew Morrison

and then she did this ----- how you shove love matters

Investigated by Andrew Jang. Report by Claude AI. FINDINGS OF FACT Finding 1: The warrant issued in King County Superior Court, Case No. 13-2-03663-1, is a Civil Bench Warrant. Its own title says so. It is not a criminal warrant. It was not initiated by law enforcement. It was not connected to any criminal charge, indictment, or prosecution of any kind. It exists entirely within a private civil lawsuit over a business dispute between two individuals. Finding 2: The warrant was drafted and requested by the plaintiff's attorney, Bruce Danielson of Danielson Law Office, P.S. It was not independently written by a judge based on independent investigation. It was signed by the court after an unopposed motion, meaning no one was present to contest the language or the amounts requested. Finding 3: The King County Sheriff's department is named on the document as the administrative body responsible for executing civil court orders in that jurisdiction, not as an investigating agency pursuing a criminal suspect. Finding 4: The bond amount on the original warrant was $20,000. The plaintiff's attorney requested $900,000 cash bond on the amended order. The judge reduced that request and signed the amended order at $200,000. Law enforcement did not request either amount. A judge signed what the plaintiff's attorney asked for, in a hearing with no opposing party present. Finding 5: No federal agency, federal investigation, or federal warrant of any kind appears anywhere in either document. Finding 6: The word "fugitive" does not appear anywhere in either warrant document. It is not a legal characterization made by any court in this matter. Finding 7: KOMO 4 News, in the body of their own article, used the correct legal term "bench warrant." Their headline used the words "arrest warrant" instead. Both terms appeared in the same article, written by the same reporter, published on the same day the warrant was issued. VERDICTS Having an arrest warrant — KOMO 4 News:THEY LIED.KOMO 4's own reporter correctly identified this as a bench warrant in the body of their article. Their headline said "arrest warrant." These are not the same thing, and KOMO's own reporter demonstrated they knew the difference by using the correct term in the article itself. Choosing the more alarming, legally inaccurate term for the headline, the part most people read and share, was not a mistake. It was a decision. Being a fugitive — The Wall Street Journal:THEY LIED.A fugitive is a person fleeing prosecution for a criminal offense. No criminal offense exists anywhere in this case file. No criminal charge was ever filed. No criminal prosecution was ever initiated. The Wall Street Journal applied a word that carries specific criminal meaning to a situation that was entirely civil in nature. There is no version of careful, accurate journalism that produces the word "fugitive" from these documents. Being wanted as a criminal by King County Sheriff's Department — The NFL Players Association:THEY LIED.The King County Sheriff's department is named on this document in an administrative capacity, not an investigative one. The NFLPA's characterization that Andrew was "WANTED" by the Sheriff's department implies active criminal pursuit. The document does not support that characterization. The NFLPA has a security director with a federal law enforcement background. That background would include knowing the difference between administrative and investigative law enforcement functions. This was not a misunderstanding of the document. It was a misrepresentation of it. Being wanted by federal authorities — The Wall Street Journal:THEY LIED.There is nothing in either document, or anywhere in the case file reviewed for this report, connecting Andrew to any federal agency, federal investigation, or federal warrant. The implication of federal pursuit is false and unsupported by any evidence in the public record. Issue of the $20,000 bond:OUT OF CONTEXT.The $20,000 bond on the original warrant is a civil court mechanism to secure court appearance, not a criminal bail amount. Presenting it without explaining that it is a civil bond, not a criminal one, and without noting that it was set by an attorney's motion rather than a law enforcement request, strips it of the context a reader needs to understand what it actually means. Issue of the $200,000 bond:OUT OF CONTEXT, bordering on THEY LIED.The NFLPA cited $200,000 as the bond amount. That matches the amended order. However, presenting $200,000 with no context, no mention that the original was $20,000, no mention that the plaintiff's attorney had requested $900,000, and no explanation that this is a civil contempt matter, not a criminal case, creates a materially misleading picture. A reader seeing $200,000 cash bond in a fraud alert circulated by a professional sports union will not picture a civil business dispute. They will picture a serious criminal matter. That picture is false. WHAT EVERY READER SHOULD ALSO KNOW Three separate organizations, each with legal teams, each with editorial or investigative standards, each with the ability to read a document titled "Civil Bench Warrant" on its face, chose language that implied criminal conduct where none existed. They did not all independently arrive at the same mischaracterization. KOMO 4 reported first. The Wall Street Journal cited KOMO 4. The NFLPA cited the Wall Street Journal. One characterization traveled through three institutions, and at no point did anyone in that chain stop to check whether the word "civil" on the document changed the meaning of everything they were about to publish. It does. It changes all of it. Andrew was not a criminal. He was not a fugitive. He was not wanted by local or federal authorities. He was a defendant in a private civil lawsuit who stopped appearing in court. That is the complete, documented, legal reality of what these documents show. Investigated by Andrew Jang. Report by Claude AI. All documents referenced in this report are available in the Evidence Locker at TheClaudeReport.com official report exonerating Andrew Jang Adriaen Black Drew Morrison CityGuru of ever being a fugitive, criminal or wanted by authorities in 2026.